Write Your Manuscript

You’ve done your research – now it’s time to share it with the world!

Many scientists communicate their work by writing a scientific manuscript (sometimes called an “article” or “paper”). In the manuscript, scientists describe what researchers studied, how they did their research, what they discovered, and what their data and results mean. They then submit their manuscript to a scientific journal or preprint (like eiRxiv) to share their work with the world. 

Different journals and preprints have different content and formatting requirements manuscripts must meet in order to be accepted. Read the instructions below to learn how to format and write your manuscript for eiRxiv! 

Note: Manuscripts that do not follow our formatting or content guidelines, or that do not use our template, will not pass pre-review. 

Getting Started

Follow these steps to prepare your manuscript and make sure it meets eiRxiv’s formatting guidelines:

  1. Read through all of the submission guidelines, including all of the formatting and content guidelines on this page. 
  2. Download the printable submission checklist. Read it before you write your manuscript.
  3. Download the manuscript template below. Follow the template directions and type your manuscript into the template. 
  4. Once you have written your manuscript, check your manuscript against the submission checklist, all of our submission guidelines, and the template instructions. Have you followed all of the instructions and met all of the requirements? If you have, you’re ready to submit. If not, please revise your manuscript before you submit.

Manuscript Format & Content

Manuscript Formatting

We have strict requirements regarding your manuscript font, layout, and structure. You must use our manuscript template to make sure you meet all of these requirements: 

  • 1.5x Line Spacing
  • Font: Arial Black
    • Title: 16pt, Bold
    • Section Headings: 11pt, BOLD, ALL CAPITALIZED
    • Subheadings (if included): 11pt, Italicized
    • All other text: 11pt, unbolded
  • 1-inch margins on all sides
  • No columns
  • No more than 11 pages total from the Title through the ends of the Materials and Methods
  • No more than 8 Tables and Figures when added altogether: in other words, (Figures + Tables) ≤ 8
    • For example, (3 Figures + 5 Tables) is acceptable, but (7 Figures + 2 Tables) is not. 

 

**The best way to ensure you keep this formatting is to type directly into our template. Don’t copy/paste into it!**


Once you have finalized your manuscript, you will need to convert it to a PDF in order to submit. For more information, see Exporting a Word document to a PDF. Or, if you’re using our Word Document template within Google Docs, How to Download a Google Doc as a PDF.

 

Manuscript Content

Your manuscript should include the following sections, in this order. Please see the submission checklist (link to PDF) and manuscript template (link to PDF) for full details on what’s expected. You can also read other eiRxiv and JEI manuscripts for examples.

Title

Give your manuscript a title that: 

  • is 150 characters or less (including spaces)
  • is written in sentence case, with only the first word and proper nouns capitalized and no period at the end. For example, “Landscaping frequency correlates with eutrophication levels in Lake Clara Meer”
  • briefly describes your research; we recommend paraphrasing either the question you asked or the main results of your research
  • Note: there should NOT be a separate title page; your title & authors should be on the same page as the rest of your manuscript

List the authors and their institutions to show who did the work. See Who Can Submit to determine who can or should be listed as an author for your manuscript. 

Author order

Scientific manuscripts typically list authors in order based on how much they contributed to the work. 

This means that the author listed first did most of the work, and the author listed last did the least. In fact, the last/corresponding author sometimes only helps with designing the experiment and mentoring the other authors as they write the manuscript. 

If any student authors did equal amounts of work, you can show this by placing an asterisk (*) after their name and the statement “these authors contributed equally to this work” underneath the list of author affiliations. If any senior (adult) authors contributed equally, please use the same formatting as for student authors, but use the dagger symbol (†) instead. 

Affiliations

All authors must list an affiliation (the place where they work or where the work was done). 

  • Students should list their school or research program where the work was done – even if it’s not where they’re currently in school.
  • Parents who are serving as coordinating adult authors should use the student author’s affiliation (typically the student’s school). We only recommend listing the parent’s workplace as their affiliation if they mentored the student as part of their employment with that company. 
  • “Unaffiliated”, “mentor”, etc. are not acceptable affiliations for eiRxiv; manuscripts that use these affiliations will not pass prereview. 

Example

Let’s imagine the following authors contributed to a manuscript that they are trying to post on eiRxiv: Jaylen Smith, Sarah Johnson, Angel Ruiz, Marcus Gold, and Julie Zhang. 

  • Jaylen is the student who did the most work. He goes to the same school as Sarah. 
  • Sarah and Marcus are also students and did equal amounts of work, but less than Jaylen. 
  • Angel Ruiz is the coordinating adult and an author
  • Julie Zhang is another adult author, but is not the corresponding author. 

In this example, the authors and their affiliations would be listed like this on the cover page when they submit their manuscript: 

Jaylen Smith1, Sarah Johnson1*, Marcus Gold2*, Julie Zhang3, Angel Ruiz4

1Allan Bayer High School, Smithsville, Alabama

2Corbin Downs High School, Citytown, Georgia

3Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia

4University of Florida, Jacksonville, Florida

*These authors contributed equally to this work

Changing author order after submission

To make submission as smooth as possible, please make sure all necessary authors are listed, they are in the correct order, and they all agree to submitting the manuscript before you submit your manuscript to eiRxiv. 

If you would like to add, remove, or change the order of authors after submissions, all authors will need to consent in writing. We reserve the right to reach out directly to any authors impacted by these changes. 

Because each manuscript is posted with a permanent DOI, authors cannot be added, removed, or changed after the manuscript is posted.

The Summary (sometimes called an “Abstract” in other journals) is a short paragraph summarizing your research and why it is important. It should briefly answer: 

  • Why is the study important, or what problem or knowledge gap does your study try to address? 
  • What is your research question or the purpose of the study? 
  • What was the main hypothesis you tested? 
  • What methods did you use to test this hypothesis (a very brief overview)? 
  • What were your main results? 
  • What did you conclude, and why are these conclusions important? 

The Summary should be a single paragraph (150-250 words). Unlike other parts of the manuscript, you should not include in-text citations in your Summary.

Use the Introduction to give your readers the background information they need to understand your research. The Introduction and Discussion are usually the longest sections of the manuscript. We recommend structuring the Introduction like an upside down triangle: 

  1. Start broad: Describe the big picture of your research topic, what scientists already know, and why it matters. 
  2. Narrow down: What specific part of this broader research topic are you studying, and why? What do scientists know, and what do they not know? 
  3. Get to the point: End with a short paragraph clearly stating your hypothesis (“We hypothesized…”), briefly describing your major results, and stating 1-2 key conclusions. 

 

The Introduction should: 

  • Include a minimum of three highly detailed paragraphs. 
  • Include parenthetical, in-text citations to support all background information you include or claims you make that are not common knowledge or your own creation. 
  • Include a clearly stated hypothesis that starts with “We hypothesized…” See Topics We Accept to make sure we accept your type of research and your hypothesis meets our guidelines. Do not present your hypothesis as a null and/or alternate hypothesis. 
  • NOT include any subsections or subheadings. 

The Results section is where you describe what you observed during your experiments or modeling and the outcomes of your analysis. 

For each experiment or analysis you did, you should: 

  • Briefly describe why you did the experiment
  • Briefly explain how you did the experiment, describing both treatments and controls (1-2 sentences only, just to help your readers understand the data; you’ll give more details in the Methods section)
  • Tell what you observed, making sure to:
    • Reference any figures or tables that show your results
    • Be as detailed possible
    • State exact measurements (for example, “control plants grew to an average height of 11.5 ± 0.3cm, while treatment plants grew to an average height of 17.4 ± 2.1cm” gives enough detail; “treatment plants were taller than control plants” doesn’t give enough detail.) 
    • Report p-values for any statistical tests you ran

Top five tips for a successful Results section: 

  1. Divide your results section into smaller parts, with each part focusing on one main experiment or result. Use Italicized subheadings to title each of these smaller parts. 
  2. Write in past tense.
  3. Focus on describing your observations, not explaining their broader meaning.
  4. Use our statistics guide to help you understand how to analyze and report your data. 
  5. Reference your figures and tables using parentheses. For example, “Plants grown in synthesized soil grew significantly taller than those grown in harvested soil (11.5 ± 0.3cm vs. 17.4 ± 2.1cm, p<0.01, paired t-test. Figure 2).” 

The Discussion section is where you can explain what your results mean in the context of your research question, your hypothesis, and the larger field of study. The Discussion is one of the longest sections of the manuscript, and should include lots of in-text citations. 

We recommend structuring your Discussion as a triangle (opposite to the Introduction). 

Step 1: Start narrow

  • Summarize your results, making sure all results are also mentioned in the Results section
  • Interpret your results – what do they mean? 
  • Explain what your results mean for your hypothesis. Do your results support your hypothesis, or not?

Step 2: Get a little broader

  • Explain what your results mean for the broader field of study (use lots of citations!). Be careful not to overstate your results or conclusions. 
  • Compare your results to what other studies and scientists have found (make sure you use citations!). 
  • Discuss any limitations of your study, what could be improved, and what is still unknown.

Step 3: Go extra broad and look to the future

  • Suggest ways your research could be used to guide future research, or what scientists still need to learn. What other experiments would help confirm or expand your results? Did your results raise new questions? End with a short paragraph summarizing the whole Discussion

 

Be careful with your conclusions! 

As scientists, we get excited about our work and what it could mean for the world. However, it’s also important for us to recognize the limitations of our work. If we make statements or claim impacts beyond what our experiments actually show, we may accidentally mislead our readers. Follow these guidelines to write an accurate, scientifically supported Discussion: 

  • Stick to what your results show

Make sure your claims are clearly and directly supported by the experiments you did and your observations

For example, let’s say you studied mice and found the mice who ran the fastest also had a certain allele of gene A. 

You could say: This allele of gene A is associated with how fast mice can run. 

You could not say: Humans who are slow runners probably also have gene A. 

  • Avoid speculations

Similarly, you can propose reasons or explanations for what you observed, but unless your experiment clearly showed these factors caused your results, you should make it clear that you are just speculating. If other studies support your explanation, cite them. 

For example, let’s say you found a certain chemical found in dandelions killed cancer cells in a petri dish. 

You could say: This chemical from dandelions killed cancer cells when tested in a petri dish. Further studies are needed to determine whether it could be an effective anti-cancer treatment.  

You could not say: This chemical from dandelions is an effective anti-cancer treatment and would have minimal side effects because it came from a plant. 


  • Beware of Correlation vs. Causation

Causation occurs when one factor clearly causes another. For example, increasing the temperature typically causes people to sweat more. 

Correlation happens when two factors seem to be mathematically related, but we don’t know whether one causes the other. For example, people sweat more when it’s hot, and people eat more ice cream when it’s hot. Sweating and eating ice cream are correlated, but one does not cause the other. 

You could say: Ice cream consumption rates and sweating are positively correlated.

You could not say: Eating ice cream causes sweating. 


  • Avoid definitive language

Because science is always evolving as we learn more, scientists very rarely claim their results are definite. Avoid words like “prove”, “definitely”, or “always” when discussing your hypothesis and results. Instead, use words like “suggest”, “indicate”, or “support”. 

You could say: Our results suggest increasing carbon dioxide concentration decreases enzyme activity.

You could not say: Our results prove increasing carbon dioxide concentration decreases enzyme activity.  

The Materials and Methods section is like an instruction manual for your science. This is where you clearly describe how you did your experiments so other people can repeat and learn from them. To write your Materials and Methods: 

  • Write in paragraphs, not lists or numbered steps.
  • Introduce the materials as you describe the methods – do not include a separate list of materials. For example, “Arabidopsis thanliana seedlings were germinated in paper towel-lined petri dishes in an incubator at 21°C.”  
  • When describing materials, please include the company/manufacturer and catalog number for any organism strains, unique materials, or unique equipment.
  • You can use Italicized subheadings  to create a subsection for each experiment or method. For each experiment, describe what you did, the materials used, what you measured, and how you collected your data. 
  • Include a subsection describing how you analyzed your data. 
  • Optional: If you used code, upload it to GitHub and include a link in your Materials and Methods and in your References.

Using Brand-name Products

Please only refer to manufactured products in your manuscript using their generic or non-proprietary names (e.g., “acetaminophen”, not “Tylenol®”; or “facial tissue”, not “Kleenex®”). Mentioning specific brand names in your research can leave the author open to legal action by the manufacturer. 

You may refer to the supplier or manufacturer once in your Methods section (e.g., “semaglutide manufactured by Novo Nordisk”, not “Ozempic®”). Manufacturers should not be mentioned outside of the Methods section. 

Any manuscripts that mention products by their brand name or manufacturers outside of the Methods section will not pass pre-review. 

To help readers evaluate the trustworthiness of your manuscript, you must include a Conflict of Interest statement. Guidelines to determine whether you have a COI, why it matters, and how to complete and file our COI declaration form can be found on our Academic Honesty page. 

If no authors have COIs to declare, you should simply write the following in the Conflicts of Interest section of your manuscript template: “The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest.”

If one or more authors have a COI to declare, you would briefly state each COI individually. For example, “Jane Suarez and Amy Wang declare they have no conflicts of interest. Emily Smith received a grant from XYZ Foundation to fund this research. The parent of Deandre Marcus serves on the board of the Acme Corporation, which manufactures the vitamins the authors tested.”

Use the Acknowledgments to thank people who helped you with your research project or manuscript.

Who to thank here:

  • Friends, classmates, or family who gave you feedback on your project or manuscript
  • People who helped you with supplies or let you use their equipment.
  • Anyone who gave you advice but is not an author on the manuscript
  • Groups, programs, grants, schools, or other facilities that gave you money, supplies, space, or equipment for your research. 

 

Who not to thank here:

  • Anyone who is also an author on the manuscript
  • People who did not directly contribute to your project or manuscript

*Make sure you get written permission from each person in your Acknowledgments before you submit your manuscript. The easiest way to do this is to email them and ask whether or not they consent to being named in your Acknowledgments, then save that email so you have a permanent record of their agreement. eiRxiv may ask you to submit this documentation if a dispute about the Acknowledgments ever occurs. 

As a scientist, choosing and referencing reliable sources shows everyone: 

  • You have given proper credit to any other authors or scientists for their ideas
  • You are getting your supporting information from credible scientific sources

Scientists must always provide citations for every fact, image, data, or idea that is not their own original creation. In fact, not citing your sources correctly counts as plagiarism and can have serious negative consequences for a scientist’s career! 

At eiRxiv and JEI, manuscripts that have not properly cited their sources will be sent back to the authors and–in severe cases–may be rejected. Please review JEI’s Academic Honesty page for more information on when you need to cite sources, how you should cite them, and how to avoid unintentional plagiarism. 

How to format your Citations and your Reference List

There are many ways to format your references, and each journal may have slightly 

different formatting requirements. At eiRxiv, we use JEI’s Reference Formatting Guide

Read this Guide for details on what constitutes a good reference, how to format your in-text citations, and how to format your References in a modified MLA-8 format.

In addition to these guidelines, you must also include hyperlinks for all web addresses and DOI’s. See this example for how to format your references and hyperlinks.

Figures and tables help your readers understand your results by providing visual representations of your research. 

You can have up to a total of eight (8) Figures and Tables in your eiRxiv manuscript. In other words, (Figures + Tables) ≤ 8 . 

Tables are grids of information that help you organize and compare numerical values or group information. 

Make sure each table: 

  • Has row and column headings that are easy to read and understand.
  • Has numbers clearly lined up and well spaced so they’re easy to compare. 
  • Fits within one page (if possible); tables longer than one page can be difficult to read.

Figures help you show a relationship, process, pattern, layout, difference, or other type of visual image. Figures can include:

  • Graphs:
    • Every axis needs a clear, understandable label and units. Some graphs may also need a legend.
      • If you collected the same measurement more than once, you should include error bars to let readers know how much the data varies between replicates. 
  • Images:
    • Make sure your images are clear, high resolution, and focused.
    • If size matters for your images, please use scale bars. 
  • Diagrams/Flowcharts:
    • Ensure the diagram or flowchart is easy to follow. Use simple, clear labels.

Sometimes the same data can be presented either as a Table or a Figure. If possible, we recommend using a Figure because they are usually easier to understand. 

How to make your Figures

Good figures help readers see your data quickly and clearly. When making your figures, please keep these tips in mind:

✅ Use clear labels

  • Every axis and bar should have a label and unit
  • Use readable fonts (12 pt)

 Choose color-blind friendly colors

  • Use high-contrast combinations like blue and orange, blue and yellow, or blue and red
  • Avoid using red and green or blue and purple together

✅ Be consistent

  • Use the same style, colors, and symbols across all figures when talking about the same data
  • When comparing results, please make sure the graphs use the same scale

✅ Number your figures in order

  • Figure 1 is the first you mention in your results section, then Figure 2, and so on.

Captions for Figures and Tables

Rather than putting titles on figures and tables, eiRxiv authors must use captions instead. A caption goes under your figure and contains the figure/table title and a short explanation.

A caption tells your reader what your figure is about so they can understand your results without reading your entire manuscript. Your caption goes below your figure and should can include:

    • Title (must be included) – short description telling your readers either:
      • The main takeaway from the figure or table
      • What the figure shows
    • What the table or figure shows (must be included):
      • What data does the figure show or represent?
      • Where did the data come from?
    • Statistics
      • If your figure includes statistical analysis, use your caption to tell what analysis you used, the results, and how your figure shows this (e.g., a p value). 
    • Replicates
      • If you repeated your experiment, you should mention it in your caption or note it on your figure.
    • Abbreviations
      • If you used any abbreviations in the figure, table, caption, or legend, define them in the caption. 

When writing table or figure captions, it’s helpful to ask yourself: if you gave someone only the figure/table and the caption, would they be able to understand what the figure means without reading the rest of your manuscript? 

Making Figures and Tables

  • The figures and tables you use in your manuscript should be your own, original creation. If you see a figure or table from someone else that you feel is critical to include in your own manuscript, you must: 
  1. Get written approval from the eiRxiv editorial team. They will work with you to determine if there is a way to omit the original figure/table. 
  2. Get and submit written permission from the author and the original publication in order to avoid copyright infringement.
  • If you have used software like Biorender or Canva that requires a license to publish generated figures or use templates, you must submit a copy of the license with your manuscript.
    •  Note: free version of Biorender does not allow for the publication of generated figures.
  • Do not use generative AI to create your figures or tables. Generative AI may pull from copyrighted images, causing your image to unknowingly infringe on other creators’ copyright. In addition, generative AI has been known to create scientifically inaccurate or misleading images. 

For full details on how to format your figures and tables, add captions, and reference your figures/tables in your text, read JEI’s Figure/Table Formatting Guide before you make your figures or tables. However, unlike the rules for JEI, you do not need to upload separate image or table files for eiRxiv; just include them at the end of your manuscript. 

An Appendix provides an extra section for authors to share additional necessary information that does not belong in any other section of your manuscript. 

eiRxiv only allows Appendices on a case-by-case basis; this is not just a place to make  your manuscript longer or avoid the 11-page limit. 

Examples of Appendices we accept: 

  • Code or programming scripts: Can be shared as an Appendix, or stored in a Github repository and shared as a link in the Materials and Methods. We do not accept links to other cloud platforms or storage services (such as Google Docs). 
  • Survey questions: If your study used a survey, you should provide the full text of the survey questions in your Appendix so readers can see what you asked in your survey. 

If your Appendix contains material other than code/programming scripts or survey questions, you must also upload an additional document stating 1) why the information in the Appendix is crucial to your manuscript, and 2) why it isn’t included in your main manuscript sections.

Grammar & Writing Style

Science communication challenges even the best writers to turn complex concepts into easily understandable content. While everyone has a different writing style, scientific manuscripts tend to use more formal language. At the same time, readers may struggle to read a scientific manuscript that is too complex; many people in recent years have therefore called for scientists to communicate their science in a way that more people can understand. 

At eiRxiv, we recommend the following strategies to make sure your writing is scientific yet easy to understand: 

STYLE AND CONTENT

  • Write in your own words – don’t use AI or copy someone else’s words! 
  • Make sure you understand every word you write. 
    • Science often uses unfamiliar terminology with very precise meanings. If you don’t know what a word, phrase, or concept means, look it up! 
  • Define any acronyms or key terms. 
    • If a scientific term or acronym is new to you, it’s likely new to your readers, too. Certain terms may also have different meanings in various scientific fields. Define any key terms or acronyms the first time you use them in your manuscript.
  • Sometimes, simpler is better!
    • Remember that just having more words, complex words, or long words doesn’t automatically make your writing better or more scientific. 
  • Remember your audience. 
    • We encourage you to write your manuscript so that both scientists and a typical student your age could read it. 
  • Have someone who wasn’t involved in the project read your manuscript. 
    • Sometimes scientists become so immersed in their research they forget other people don’t have the same expertise they do. Can this person who is unfamiliar with your work understand your manuscript? Are there words, phrases, or sections they struggle with? Use their feedback to help make your manuscript easier to understand. 
  • Use in-text citations

GRAMMAR

  • Write in paragraphs. Do not include any bullet points, numbered/lettered lists, or outlines. 
  • Avoid contractions and informal language
  • Avoid sentence fragments or run-on sentences
  • If you ever need to write about yourself / the research team, use “we” instead of “I” (even if you are only referring to one person)
  • Write in active voice (except in the Methods). See this guide for more information on identifying passive vs. active voice, and converting your writing to active voice.